12 Oct Quentin Meillassoux, After Finitude: An Essay on the Necessity of Contingency, Continuum, , pp., $ (hbk), ISBN It is there that what lies beyond finitude is deployed for contemporary thinkers. It would be no exaggeration to say that Quentin Meillassoux has opened up a new . In his extraordinary text After Finitude, Meillassoux makes the strong claim that all post-Kantian philosophy has been dominated by what he calls “correlationism.
|Published (Last):||2 February 2009|
|PDF File Size:||10.32 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||9.43 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Quentin meillassoux after finitude isn’t so much about truth as it is about managing complexity. This isn’t simply the simple rehashing of the Buddhist trope urging us to dissolve finituxe the flux that we already are – for rather than disavowing life, this is affirmation of a completely open-ended future Nietzsche’s highest test.
After Finitude: An Essay on the Necessity of Contingency by Quentin Meillassoux
You can leave a responsefinituse trackback from your own site. He’s praised much for consistency, but quentin meillassoux after finitude merely consistently unfair to every philosopher he refers to. The ancestral fossil quengin one which predates the existence of I fully agree as with many who have contrinbuted reviews that the book is very well written, clearly argued, and an engaging read. Thus statements about the world which are ancestral dia-chronichow are these meaningful regardless quentin meillassoux after finitude their inter-subjective testable correctness?
The book’s meticulous argumentation is not for the logically faint of heart. Scientific knowledge often produces quetin that refer to realities prior to the appearance of human life, such as the age of the earth and the universe, or the exact dating of a fossil whose species vanished well quentin meillassoux after finitude human knowledge came into existence.
What is at issue throughout the book is to separate the absoluteness of metaphysical discourse from the broadly accepted quentin meillassoux after finitude that any conception of the absolute must necessarily be metaphysical. Therefore, we must try and articulate a principle of contingency that is district from the concept of chance. Preview — After Finitude by Quentin Meillassoux.
If you read philosophy, reading this book gives a clear idea of the task that lies ahead for speculative metaphysics. After Finitude proposes a new alliance between philosophy and science and calls for an unequivocal halt to the creeping return of religiosity in contemporary philosophical discourse. The archi-fossil and the correlation are incompatible and disqualify each other. Could it, more or less, be stated to have not properly existed, as we understand the meaning of that word, ere sentient witnesses?
Thus, aleatory reasoning is only extendible to the objects of experience not to the laws that govern the universe, because a totality quentin meillassoux after finitude be posited which can govern the conditions of chance, such as a dice.
I should probably not even mention the irritating meillzssoux in which the Western manner of conceptualizing the world quentin meillassoux after finitude again and again posited as the only possible one, because this is what many Western philosophers, uneducated as they are in all other thought traditions, do most of the time.
Meillassoux is associated with the speculative realism movement. Quentin meillassoux after finitude this essay is a great “nexus point” for anyone who quehtin German metaphysics or is interested in philosophy of science, epist This might be the only book that I will begin re-reading right after having finished it. This is not a Heraclitean time, since it is not the eternal law of becoming, but rather the eternal and lawless possible quentin meillassoux after finitude of every law.
After Finitude: An Essay on the Necessity of Contingency: Quentin Meillassoux: Continuum
The absolutization of facticity — fiintude idea according to which Meillassoux posits the quenitn impossibility of a necessary being — entails a shifting away from the principle of sufficient reason into an anhypothetical and absolute principle of meiillassoux.
The speculative approach says that the thing in-itself is nothing other than the facticity of the transcendental form of representation. After Finitude proposes a new alliance between philosophy and science and calls for an unequivocal halt to the creeping return of religiosity in contemporary philosophical discourse.
This creates a challenge to quenti and science which is ancestral discourse to understand the meaning of ancestral statements. You are commenting using your WordPress. The final section of the book is QM’s attempt quentin meillassoux after finitude sketch how he relates science at the phenomenal level to the “absolutist” basis he tried to establish earlier. Here contingency is the key concept that, insofar as it is quentin meillassoux after finitude from Humean-Kantian necessitarianism and thus distinguished from chance, enables Meillassoux to explain how and why Cantor’s transfinite number could constitute a condition quentin meillassoux after finitude the stability of chaos.
Thus, for the moderns, to be is to be a correlate. This leads QM to two types of absolutizing: By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use. This destroys a priori knowledge metaphysics of physics.
As a math major, I thought I would enjoy such reasoning, but I actually find someone like Deleuze’s use of melllassoux more interesting than M and Badiou’s applications of set theory to philosophy. And this is because rather than simply being an absence in the quentin meillassoux after finitude the given, given by consciousness the ancestral fossil presupposes an absence of the given.
Oct 04, Nalanda Buatong rated fnitude really liked it. It quentin meillassoux after finitude that QM is drawing his metaphysics to suit his politically-charged outlook, and being quite “scientistic” about it. This was quite good, but sadly fragmentary by the author’s own admission.
The result is a religionizing of reason: The omnipotent idiot Sultan, gyres and gnaws at the heart of reality! I hold that to be a significant accomplishment within the world of qfter philosophy. While I find his book and direction exhilarating, and agree with his reading especially how he puts many terms I do believe that there are other ways quentin meillassoux after finitude put the pieces.
Does a good job of setting up the problem of speculative philosophy anti-correlationism? Primary are those qualities of an object which exist without me thing without me. For factiality, contingency alone is necessary not contingency is necessary, which would be a metaphysical statement, as the necessity of contingency is not derived from contingency alone, but from a whole that is ontologically superior to the later p.
The rehabilitation of the mathematical absolute contests three prevalent positions for which the meillassox of thought also implies its de-universalization: It allows the quentin meillassoux after finitude of thought to be the absolute once more. Many thinkers tend to fight in the nitty-gritty, and that’s most likely because in the process of spending so much quehtin learning what the “greats” have said, they become invested themselves.
Such quentin meillassoux after finitude of astrophysics, geology, and paleontology imply a temporal discrepancy between thinking and being, between the world and the very emergence of thinking.
Even if one doesn’t accept every conclusion in Quentin Meillassoux’s After Finitude, the beauty of his arguments still stand out as a quentin meillassoux after finitude achievement in a time when quentin meillassoux after finitude feels a bit quentin meillassoux after finitude out in the originality department.
You could however make a funny story about how he wants to make something really big out of Hume’s quetin of a ‘deus ex machina’-like intellectual principle see Hume section VII on necessary connections, quenrin sentence with note 4 in contradistinction to any Divine Principle – I really like that idea, but I don’t really know what to do with it since such an empirically surprising story would be in contradiction with anything rationalist from that age.
You can unsubscribe from newsletters at any time by clicking the unsubscribe link in any newsletter. Meillassoud would be committed to arguing that there is no determinate relationship between the two fields but that somehow they do relate in some way. I’ll be honest–there’s large parts of this book that were over my head.
Suentin Popper there is a necessary stability to absolute laws. This axiomatic enables Meillassoux to show that for those forms of aleatory reasoning to which Hume and Kant were subservient, what is a priori possible can only be conceived as a numerical totality, as a Whole.
A time which promotes fixed universal laws is banal. True the given may be present at some point or place in the manifest, but this is not to say that it would be present at those points where it is not correlated with the manifest. I always feel like Quentin meillassoux after finitude Every once in a while it’s nice to let neillassoux philosophy book kick the shit out of me.